<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed version="0.3" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xml:lang="en">
<title>Kevin Railsback&apos;s Blog</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://kevin.railsback.com/" />
<modified>2007-05-17T04:13:14Z</modified>
<tagline>Thoughts on technology, science, zymurgy, and music</tagline>
<id>tag:kevin.railsback.com,2007://1</id>
<generator url="http://www.movabletype.org/" version="3.2">Movable Type</generator>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2007, Kevin Railsback</copyright>
<entry>
<title>Failure is always an option</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://kevin.railsback.com/archives/2007/04/failure_bush.html" />
<modified>2007-05-17T04:13:14Z</modified>
<issued>2007-04-07T08:15:04Z</issued>
<id>tag:kevin.railsback.com,2007://1.100</id>
<created>2007-04-07T08:15:04Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Bush shows up at #2 if you Google for &apos;failure&apos;. Should we be surprised? Technorati has some serious Google Voodoo to top him. I&apos;m not sure whether to be sad or to laugh.......</summary>
<author>
<name>Kevin Railsback</name>
<url>http://kevin.railsback.com</url>
<email>kevin@railsback.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Politics</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://kevin.railsback.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>Bush shows up at #2 if you Google for 'failure'.  Should we be surprised?  Technorati has some serious Google Voodoo to top him.<br />
<img alt="failure.png" src="http://kevin.railsback.com/failure.png" width="627" height="535" /></p>

<p>I'm not sure whether to be sad or to laugh....<br />
</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Updated Parallels out of beta!</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://kevin.railsback.com/archives/2007/02/updated_paralle.html" />
<modified>2007-03-11T07:34:53Z</modified>
<issued>2007-02-27T18:14:22Z</issued>
<id>tag:kevin.railsback.com,2007://1.99</id>
<created>2007-02-27T18:14:22Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">After an extensive Beta and Release Candidate cycle, the new release version of Parallels has now been finalized. This upgrade to the previous release of Parallels brings the following feature updates: Coherence view - Hides your XP desktop and floats...</summary>
<author>
<name>Kevin Railsback</name>
<url>http://kevin.railsback.com</url>
<email>kevin@railsback.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>System Administration</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://kevin.railsback.com/">
<![CDATA[<table border=0 width=480><tr><td width=380>After an extensive Beta and Release Candidate cycle, the new release version of Parallels has now been finalized.  This upgrade to the previous release of Parallels brings the following feature updates:</td><td width=100><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script></td></tr></table>
<ul><li>Coherence view - Hides your XP desktop and floats Windows windows alongside your OS X windows
<li>Windows apps appear in the OS X dock
<li>Parallels Transporter - allows easy migration of your existing XP setup from a PC into the Parallels environment
<li>Plug-and-play USB 2.0 support
<li>Use of Boot Camp partitions as the Parallels drive - this lets you use a single XP image either running virtually under Parallels, or natively if you reboot via Boot Camp
<li>Vista Compatability
<li>CD/DVD burning
Drag-and-Drop support (<a href="http://weblog.infoworld.com/railsback/archives/2007/02/parallels_users.html">discussed previously here</a>)</ul>

<p>For those running Parallels RC3 (build 3170) won't see much difference.  Those still running the old Parallels public release (build 1970) will see amazing enhancements.  As always, make sure you back up your full Parallels disk image, and your Mac just to be safe, before you upgrade.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.parallels.com/en/download/desktop/">Download release 3186 here</a></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Parallels Users, Beware of Windows Exploits impacting OS X</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://kevin.railsback.com/archives/2007/02/parallels_users.html" />
<modified>2007-03-11T07:34:08Z</modified>
<issued>2007-02-12T19:28:13Z</issued>
<id>tag:kevin.railsback.com,2007://1.98</id>
<created>2007-02-12T19:28:13Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">It sounds obvious that Parallels users who run Windows need to keep on top of Windows security and patches. However, a recent addition to the Parallels Beta, called Global Sharing, can open up OS X itself to possible attacks from...</summary>
<author>
<name>Kevin Railsback</name>
<url>http://kevin.railsback.com</url>
<email>kevin@railsback.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>System Administration</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://kevin.railsback.com/">
<![CDATA[<table border=0 width=480><tr><td width=380>It sounds obvious that Parallels users who run Windows need to keep on top of Windows security and patches.  However, a recent addition to the Parallels Beta, called Global Sharing, can open up OS X itself to possible attacks from the Windows side.</td><td width=100><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script></td></tr></table>

<p>The basic issue is that this Global Sharing option, which allows easy drag-and-drop app launching between OS X and Windows, is given carte blanche access to your Mac hard drive.  Worse yet, this option is enabled by default, at least in beta build 3150 which I am currently running.  Users upgrading from a previous version, to get awesome features like Coherence Mode, booting from Boot Camp partitions, and full USB support, may be vulnerable without even realizing this feature was slipped in.</p>

<p>The basic problem boils down to privilege separation.  Parallels runs with the full rights of your OS X user, so in theory an attack could be developed and spread via Windows vulnerabilities that could then drop malicious code into OS X.  It could also delete files or alter security and other settings.</p>

<p>Allowing Windows, known to be so insecure, to have this sort of access rights to the host operating system is a major misstep by the Parallels team.  So if you run Parallels betas, please make sure you disable this feature (Edit -> Virtual Machine -> Shared Folders then uncheck the "Enable global sharing for drag-and-drop" checkbox and save.  You'll need to shut down the virtual machine to have access to change this setting.<br />
</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Bill Gates, confused or deluded?</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://kevin.railsback.com/archives/2007/02/bill_gates_conf.html" />
<modified>2007-03-11T07:33:17Z</modified>
<issued>2007-02-02T19:25:18Z</issued>
<id>tag:kevin.railsback.com,2007://1.97</id>
<created>2007-02-02T19:25:18Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">I was reading a Newsweek interview with Bill Gates this morning, and was was of course expecting a bit of spin. But I wasn&apos;t expecting Bill to be living in his own Reality Distortion Field (no longer a Jobs-only superpower,...</summary>
<author>
<name>Kevin Railsback</name>
<url>http://kevin.railsback.com</url>
<email>kevin@railsback.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>WTF?</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://kevin.railsback.com/">
<![CDATA[<table border=0 width=480><tr><td width=380>I was reading a <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16934083/site/newsweek/">Newsweek interview with Bill Gates</a> this morning, and was was of course expecting a bit of spin.  But I wasn't expecting Bill to be living in his own Reality Distortion Field (no longer a Jobs-only superpower, apparently).  On the second page of the interview, in a question about feature comparisons between OS X and Windows, and how they both borrow features from each other, Bill had this to say:</td><td width=100><iframe src="http://weblog.infoworld.com/railsback/diggthis-gatesfud.html" frameborder="0" height="115" width="100" float="right">&amp;amp;lt;br&amp;gt;</iframe></td></tr></table>
<blockquote>"Nowadays, security guys break the Mac every single day. Every single day, they come out with a total exploit, your machine can be taken over totally. I dare anybody to do that once a month on the Windows machine."</blockquote>

<p>Now, I understand that Gates is pushing hard to convince folks to upgrade to Vista, but this is such a classic example of FUD (fear, uncertainty, and doubt) that Microsoft is famous for.</p>

<p>The interviewer should have followed up asking if Bill could cite one example of a Mac exploit allowing a machine takeover.  And how can he claim that Windows isn't vulnerable to such attacks?<br />
</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>MacBooks now Core2Duo</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://kevin.railsback.com/archives/2006/11/macbooks_now_co.html" />
<modified>2007-03-11T07:32:05Z</modified>
<issued>2006-11-08T15:33:19Z</issued>
<id>tag:kevin.railsback.com,2006://1.96</id>
<created>2006-11-08T15:33:19Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"> The MacBook has moved to the full 64-bit Core2Duo. As with the MacBook Pro and iMac move, this won&apos;t have a huge performance impact but it does pave the way for taking full advantage of Leopard....</summary>
<author>
<name>Kevin Railsback</name>
<url>http://kevin.railsback.com</url>
<email>kevin@railsback.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Apple</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://kevin.railsback.com/">
<![CDATA[<p><br />
The MacBook has moved to the full 64-bit Core2Duo.  As with the MacBook Pro and iMac move, this won't have a huge performance impact but it does pave the way for taking full advantage of Leopard.</p>

<p><img src="http://weblog.infoworld.com/railsback/core2duo.png"><br />
</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Touch-screen iPod leak by Apple?</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://kevin.railsback.com/archives/2006/11/touchscreen_ipo.html" />
<modified>2007-03-11T07:30:18Z</modified>
<issued>2006-11-02T16:50:30Z</issued>
<id>tag:kevin.railsback.com,2006://1.95</id>
<created>2006-11-02T16:50:30Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">In an iPod developer feature guide on the Apple website, they apparently have leaked a confirmation of the upcoming touch screen iPod. On page 10 of the PDF (available at http://developer.apple.com/hardwaredrivers/ipod/iPodNotesFeatureGuideCB.pdf) the following text appears: Note: Linking to photos and...</summary>
<author>
<name>Kevin Railsback</name>
<url>http://kevin.railsback.com</url>
<email>kevin@railsback.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Apple</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://kevin.railsback.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>In an iPod developer feature guide on the Apple website, they apparently have leaked a confirmation of the upcoming touch screen iPod.  On page 10 of the PDF (available at <a href="http://developer.apple.com/hardwaredrivers/ipod/iPodNotesFeatureGuideCB.pdf">http://developer.apple.com/hardwaredrivers/ipod/iPodNotesFeatureGuideCB.pdf</a>) the following text appears:<br />
<blockquote>Note: Linking to photos and videos is supported only for 5th generation iPods running iPod Software version 1.2 or later. All other Notes feature capabilities described in this document are supported for iPod models with display screens, beginning with the touch-screen models. <br />
</blockquote></p>

<p>In the PDF that section shows a bar off to the left, like it is still text undergoing editing and most likely was not meant to be released to the public:<br />
<img src="http://weblog.infoworld.com/railsback/touchscreenipod.png"></p>

<p>It will be interesting to see how quickly that PDF gets changed by Apple now that it has been discovered.</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Stupid IT Tricks: Myspace.com</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://kevin.railsback.com/archives/2006/10/stupid_it_tricks.html" />
<modified>2007-03-11T07:29:23Z</modified>
<issued>2006-10-31T16:29:50Z</issued>
<id>tag:kevin.railsback.com,2006://1.94</id>
<created>2006-10-31T16:29:50Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Managing your company&apos;s public DNS is serious business - a small typo or mistake can have serious consequences to your website, email, and other services. For example, someone made what can only be assumed as a clueless mistake when updating...</summary>
<author>
<name>Kevin Railsback</name>
<url>http://kevin.railsback.com</url>
<email>kevin@railsback.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>WTF?</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://kevin.railsback.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>Managing your company's public DNS is serious business - a small typo or mistake can have serious consequences to your website, email, and other services.</p>

<p>For example, someone made what can only be assumed as a clueless mistake when updating their DNS - they added 127.0.0.1 to their records for the myspace.com.  For those with weak network-fu, that is a special address which is only used for 'localhost' (your own computer).  Since they had 5 hosts listed total, one out of five requests for their domain were going nowhere while this problem existed.<br />
<blockquote><br />
$ host -vv myspace.com<br />
Trying "myspace.com"<br />
;; ->>HEADER< <- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 24145<br />
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 5, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0</p>

<p>;; QUESTION SECTION:<br />
;myspace.com. IN A</p>

<p>;; ANSWER SECTION:<br />
myspace.com. 68350 IN A 216.178.32.51<br />
myspace.com. 68350 IN A 216.178.32.50<br />
myspace.com. 68350 IN A 216.178.32.49<br />
myspace.com. 68350 IN A 216.178.32.48<br />
myspace.com. 68350 IN A 127.0.0.1</p>

<p>Received 109 bytes from 208.67.222.222#53 in 9 ms <br />
</blockquote><br />
I'm not sure why they're still using round-robin DNS load balancing for their site with good ServerIron, Cisco, and F5 load balancers doing a much better job overall.  We moved InfoWorld.com away from RRDNS years ago.  </p>

<p>Fortunately either someone at MySpace noticed the issue quickly, or they saw the post at <a href="http://blog.opendns.com/2006/10/30/hey-myspacecom-we-cant-reach-you-on-127001/">OpenDNS.com </a>or on <a href="http://www.digg.com/tech_news/myspace_com_127_0_0_1">Digg</a> and remedied the issue.  But having such high TTLs in their DNS settings I'm sure the problem took a while to finally clear up completely.<br />
</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Core2Duo MacBook Pros - not a big surprise</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://kevin.railsback.com/archives/2006/10/core2duo_macbooks.html" />
<modified>2007-03-11T07:27:31Z</modified>
<issued>2006-10-24T19:50:01Z</issued>
<id>tag:kevin.railsback.com,2006://1.93</id>
<created>2006-10-24T19:50:01Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"> Apple has officially announced new MacBook Pro models with the Core 2 Duo (Merom) CPU. This has been in the rumor mill for some time. While the speed bump of the Core 2 Duo isn&apos;t huge, it&apos;s pure 64bit...</summary>
<author>
<name>Kevin Railsback</name>
<url>http://kevin.railsback.com</url>
<email>kevin@railsback.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Apple</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://kevin.railsback.com/">
<![CDATA[<table><tr><td><span class=artText>
Apple has officially announced new MacBook Pro models with the Core 2 Duo (Merom) CPU.  This has been in the rumor mill for some time.  While the speed bump of the Core 2 Duo isn't huge, it's pure 64bit which will have a greater impact when Leopard comes out (which is fully 64bit).

<p>For the time being, two other additions make this a very attractive release: they've now added Firewire 800 support back into the 15.4" model, and also made all SuperDrives dual-layer capable.</span></td><td><img src="http://weblog.infoworld.com/railsback/core2duo.png" width="126" height="126" /></td></tr></table><span class=artText>In the 2.33GHz model, the standard RAM has been upped to 2GB (InfoWorld's standard for both MBP and ThinkPad purchases) and the max RAM is now 3GB instead of 2GB.</p>

<p>Check out <a href="http://weblog.infoworld.com/enterprisemac/archives/2006/10/core_2_duo_macb.html">Enterprise Mac</a> for more details, as well as the <a href="http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/">MacBook Pro page</a> on Apple's site.</span></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Firefox 2.0 posted a day early</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://kevin.railsback.com/archives/2006/10/firefox_20.html" />
<modified>2007-03-11T07:26:10Z</modified>
<issued>2006-10-23T23:37:56Z</issued>
<id>tag:kevin.railsback.com,2006://1.92</id>
<created>2006-10-23T23:37:56Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"> The official festivities are scheduled for Tuesday 10/24, but the actual download files have already been posted to the official Firefox download site: http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/2.0/ OS X: http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/2.0/mac/en-US/Firefox 2.0.dmg Linux: http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/2.0/linux-i686/en-US/firefox-2.0.tar.gz WinXP: http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/2.0/win32/en-US/Firefox Setup 2.0.exe Enjoy!...</summary>
<author>
<name>Kevin Railsback</name>
<url>http://kevin.railsback.com</url>
<email>kevin@railsback.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://kevin.railsback.com/">
<![CDATA[<table><tr><td><img src="http://www.mozilla.com/img/firefox-logo-64x64.png"></td><td>
The official festivities are scheduled for Tuesday 10/24, but the actual download files have already been posted to the official Firefox download site:
<a href="http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/2.0/">http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/2.0/</a>
</td></tr></table>

<p>OS X: <br />
<a href="http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/2.0/mac/en-US/Firefox%202.0.dmg">http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/2.0/mac/en-US/Firefox 2.0.dmg</a></p>

<p>Linux: <br />
<a href="http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/2.0/linux-i686/en-US/firefox-2.0.tar.gz">http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/2.0/linux-i686/en-US/firefox-2.0.tar.gz</a></p>

<p>WinXP: <br />
<a href="http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/2.0/win32/en-US/Firefox%20Setup%202.0.exe">http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/2.0/win32/en-US/Firefox Setup 2.0.exe</a></p>

<p>Enjoy!<br />
</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Zune</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://kevin.railsback.com/archives/2006/09/zune.html" />
<modified>2006-09-28T23:09:37Z</modified>
<issued>2006-09-28T22:59:54Z</issued>
<id>tag:kevin.railsback.com,2006://1.91</id>
<created>2006-09-28T22:59:54Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">So, after the iPod price drops Microsoft has rethought their offering and lowered their initial price. Like with the Xbox, they&apos;ll be taking a loss per-unit to try and break into the market. But even at a loss, they&apos;re charging...</summary>
<author>
<name>Kevin Railsback</name>
<url>http://kevin.railsback.com</url>
<email>kevin@railsback.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>iPod / iTunes</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://kevin.railsback.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>So, after the iPod price drops Microsoft has rethought their offering and lowered their initial price.  Like with the Xbox, they'll be taking a loss per-unit to try and break into the market.  But even at a loss, they're charging slightly more than the iPod (99c more).</p>

<p>Even more confusing is to buy songs for the Zune you buy "points" (80 points per dollar) and songs cost 79 points each.  Obviously a ploy to get folks to think the music is cheaper than iTunes Stores $0.99 per track, as well as banking all of those single points that are going unspent, until you buy 79 songs then you will have enough extra points to buy one more.  </p>

<p>If you do the math, the Zune tracks actually are cheaper, $0.9875 per track.  You save a whopping $0.0025 (1/4 cent) per song compared to iTMS!  So if you buy 396 Zune songs you'll make back the extra $0.99 you paid vs the $249 30GB iPod?   After you buy 396 it's ALL PROFIT!  </p>

<p>And it comes in BROWN too?</p>

<p>I can see the marketing headlines already: "Zune, the 'number two' music player!"<br />
</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>New lens - 100mm macro</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://kevin.railsback.com/archives/2006/08/canon_100mm_macro.html" />
<modified>2006-08-21T06:46:41Z</modified>
<issued>2006-08-17T03:28:16Z</issued>
<id>tag:kevin.railsback.com,2006://1.90</id>
<created>2006-08-17T03:28:16Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Just got a new lens - Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM - which I&apos;ve been wanting since I got my Digital Rebel XT in December. Pictures to come as I figure it out. This is supposed to be an...</summary>
<author>
<name>Kevin Railsback</name>
<url>http://kevin.railsback.com</url>
<email>kevin@railsback.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Photography / Flickr</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://kevin.railsback.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>Just got a new lens - <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00004XOM3/kevinrailsbas-20?creative=327641&camp=14573&adid=079GMTQ1BC95EMC09GMH&link_code=as1">Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM</a> - which I've been wanting since I got my <a href="http://mt.railsback.com/mt.cgi?__mode=view&_type=entry&id=89&blog_id=1">Digital Rebel XT</a> in December.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00004XOM3/kevinrailsbas-20?creative=327641&camp=14573&adid=079GMTQ1BC95EMC09GMH&link_code=as1"><img src="http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/P/B00004XOM3.01._AA280_SCLZZZZZZZ_V55092423_.jpg"></a></p>

<p>Pictures to come as I figure it out.  This is supposed to be an awesome camera for portaits as well as for macro shooting.  Whee!<br />
</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>At WWDC</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://kevin.railsback.com/archives/2006/08/at_wwdc.html" />
<modified>2006-08-21T06:28:02Z</modified>
<issued>2006-08-07T21:15:31Z</issued>
<id>tag:kevin.railsback.com,2006://1.88</id>
<created>2006-08-07T21:15:31Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"> I&apos;m at Apple&apos;s Worldwide Developer&apos;s Conference (WWDC) all week this week. Most of the conference is under NDA, so I can&apos;t comment on any of the later sessions that happen. The keynote, as usual, was excellent. The Mac Pro...</summary>
<author>
<name>Kevin Railsback</name>
<url>http://kevin.railsback.com</url>
<email>kevin@railsback.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>OS X</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://kevin.railsback.com/">
<![CDATA[<p><img src="http://static.flickr.com/79/209597323_fb93edfdef.jpg?v=0"><br />
I'm at Apple's Worldwide Developer's Conference (WWDC) all week this week.  Most of the conference is under NDA, so I can't comment on any of the later sessions that happen.</p>

<p>The keynote, as usual, was excellent.  The Mac Pro was definitely not a surprise to anyone, nor was the Xeon Xserve.  Both of these bring Apple's transition to Intel to completion.</p>

<p>Steve and other Apple execs went through 10 exciting features of Leopard, but kept some others close to the vest.  They also handed out Leopard Preview DVDs to all attendees, both for the client and server OS.</p>

<p>For much more eloquent coverage of WWDC, check out Tom Yager's <a href="http://weblog.infoworld.com/enterprisemac">Enterprise Mac</a> blog.</p>

<p><img src="http://static.flickr.com/92/209600080_cf8bb93d4c.jpg?v=0"></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Scott Adams: Brilliant</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://kevin.railsback.com/archives/2006/08/secret_society.html" />
<modified>2006-08-04T06:44:27Z</modified>
<issued>2006-08-04T06:39:42Z</issued>
<id>tag:kevin.railsback.com,2006://1.87</id>
<created>2006-08-04T06:39:42Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">In a recent post to the Dilbert Blog, Scott Adams brings up a little bit of hope for those of us depressed by the current administration. My favorite conspiracy theory is the one that says the world is being run...</summary>
<author>
<name>Kevin Railsback</name>
<url>http://kevin.railsback.com</url>
<email>kevin@railsback.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Funny</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://kevin.railsback.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>In a <a href="http://dilbertblog.typepad.com/the_dilbert_blog/2006/07/secret_society.html">recent post</a> to the <a href="http://dilbertblog.typepad.com">Dilbert Blog</a>, Scott Adams brings up a little bit of hope for those of us depressed by the current administration.<br />
<blockquote><br />
My favorite conspiracy theory is the one that says the world is being run by a handful of ultra-rich capitalists, and that our elected governments are mere puppets. I sure hope it’s true. Otherwise my survival depends on hordes of clueless goobers electing competent leaders. That’s about as likely as a dog pissing the Mona Lisa into a snow bank.</p>

<p>The only way I can get to sleep at night is by imagining a secret cabal of highly competent puppetmasters who are handling the important decisions while our elected politicians debate flag burning and the definition of marriage.</p>

<p>It’s the only explanation for how the governments of the world could be staffed with morons and yet everything still runs okay, sort of. Granted, things aren’t perfect, but when you hear our leaders talk, you have to wonder why our energy policy doesn’t involve burning asbestos on playgrounds. There must be some competent people pulling the strings behind the curtain, adjusting the money supply, twiddling with interest rates, choosing the winners for American Idol, and that sort of thing.<br />
</blockquote></p>

<p>Long live the secret cabal!  It's gotta be better than what we are told is really going on in gubmint!<br />
</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>IE7</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://kevin.railsback.com/archives/2006/07/ie7.html" />
<modified>2006-07-31T23:22:48Z</modified>
<issued>2006-07-31T23:21:27Z</issued>
<id>tag:kevin.railsback.com,2006://1.86</id>
<created>2006-07-31T23:21:27Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Looking for info on IE7? Here&apos;s a site with all the info you really need: www.ie7.com...</summary>
<author>
<name>Kevin Railsback</name>
<url>http://kevin.railsback.com</url>
<email>kevin@railsback.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Funny</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://kevin.railsback.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>Looking for info on IE7?  Here's a site with all the info you really need:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.ie7.com">www.ie7.com</a><br />
</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Flip4Mac Universal released</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://kevin.railsback.com/archives/2006/07/flip4mac_univer.html" />
<modified>2006-07-28T05:10:19Z</modified>
<issued>2006-07-28T05:06:55Z</issued>
<id>tag:kevin.railsback.com,2006://1.85</id>
<created>2006-07-28T05:06:55Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Version 2.1 of Flip4Mac is out, with Universal binary support. Flip4Mac allows Quicktime to play WMV and other Windows Media files, both in the standalone app and inside of browsers. Get it now: Flip4Mac 2.1.033...</summary>
<author>
<name>Kevin Railsback</name>
<url>http://kevin.railsback.com</url>
<email>kevin@railsback.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>OS X</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://kevin.railsback.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>Version 2.1 of Flip4Mac is out, with Universal binary support.  Flip4Mac allows Quicktime to play WMV and other Windows Media files, both in the standalone app and inside of browsers.</p>

<p>Get it now: <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=915D874D-D747-4180-A400-5F06B1B5E559&displaylang=en">Flip4Mac 2.1.033</a><br />
</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

</feed>